Wikipedia:Peer review/Misandry/archive1

Misandry
Lack of any sources, speculative statements along the lines of "Some people say that...", and general lack of anything actually academically useful in this article makes this a prime candidate for something more than just an npov or cleanup. Its not the nature of the subject that makes the article prone to lack of neutrality, but the fact that basically all of the "information" given consists entirely of opinions without qualifications. Besides giving a loose definition of misandry, this article almost wholly lacks anything academically valuable at all, except perhaps insight into the opinions of the people who bothered to contribute to the article.
 * Wikipedia:Peer review is not for articles that need serious work, but there are places you can direct your request. See the first paragraph on this page for some of them. BrianSmithson 23:04, 23 September 2005 (UTC)