Wikipedia:Peer review/Mohanlal filmography/archive1

Mohanlal filmography
I've listed this article for peer review because, I wish to nominate it for FL, so I would like some suggestions to improve its quality.

Thanks, Inside the Valley (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments from Kailash
While the prose is impressive, I suggest that the URLs be archived using the Wayback Machine or WebCite or both, as they are unlikely to last forever. Also, the author names in the URLs should follow the "last name, first name" format. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I found a cluster of refs here that cannot be deemed professional enough to be used in featured lists/articles. These include IndiaGlitz, Filmibeat, Metromatinee, Moviebuff, Indiglamour and Bollywoodlife. I request any admin to do a quick references review and list any other possibly unreliable ref. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Indiaglitz, Filmibeat, and Metromatinee are reliable as well as reputed sites. The other three are not great sources, but are verifiable. Let me check if there are any replacements available. I have partially completed the URL archiving, I am working on it. --Inside the Valley (talk) 19:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * ✅ Completed URL archiving (total 411) and replaced some unprofessional references. --Inside the Valley (talk) 17:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Now, I see the article has over 400 references; no doubt it looks so large. Just consult any admin or experienced editor and ask if there is content that can be shifted to a different article. Meanwhile, I'll start listing all unprofessional references used here and finish by Friday. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)


 * ✅ Replaced all sources you listed. Now there is 407 references in total. He has acted in almost 340 films so far, then there is other credits like singer, producer, theater, etc and a lead introduction. Around 400 references is fair in this case. No more, no less. --Inside the Valley (talk) 11:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * You may invite other editors and hope they share their comments. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Sure. Thanks for your valuable comments and support. --Inside the Valley (talk) 18:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Requested few active veteran editors, but looks like they are not interested for new comments. I presume it as an OK from them. --Inside the Valley (talk) 13:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * No, not true on my part, but you need to learn to be patient and allow 7-10 days for people to comment in a peer review.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)