Wikipedia:Peer review/Monstercat/archive1

Monstercat
I've listed this article for peer review because a group of editors, including myself, are willing to improve this page in a way that meets Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thanks, jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Some comments:

I'd call this a C-class article until some of these changes are made. Good luck and happy editing! Tritons Rising (talk) 23:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd stick the YouTube infobox directly below the main infobox, not in the History section. ✅ by 02:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The history section seems to spend way too much time on 2017: the label has definitely been active between 2012-2014 and 2015-2017, and some of that history should slot into this section. This section has the most potential for expansion
 * Singles and artists section needs sourcing ; added ref for Alone. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 02:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Some of the information from the Monstercat template at the end of the article, such as its official rosters, could be folded into the article as well ✅ with the addition of a category for Monstercat artists. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 02:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Needs more reputable third-party sources, not just music blogs but also national coverage to establish notability (I know Monstercat is huge but this article does not convey that).

I'd call this a start-class or low c-class article at the moment.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  06:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Ramblings from Anarchyte
 * "Notable albums and singles" would work better as a table, similarly to every other discography article. ✅ by Jd22292 18:27, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Ref11 is a bare link ✅ by MrLinkinPark333
 * Unless I'm mistaken, all of the sources besides HuffPost and Forbes aren't considered the most reliable. None are listed on WP:ALBUM/SOURCE (which would also apply for other music topics, too). 2 are to MC themselves and 1 is Spotify. ; the primary sources were removed, but the other sources will have to take a visit to WP:RSN for further feedback. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk)
 * Parts of the article are unsourced.
 * All listed suggestions have been either partially or fully completed. Is there anything else that can be improved? jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for these reviews. I have resolved all issues. Closing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 04:50, 28 September 2017 (UTC)