Wikipedia:Peer review/Morocco in World War II/archive1

Morocco in World War II
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like some templates, I have worries it is not set out properly or that my explanations may be too complex. I am also wondering what wikiproject it would belong to.

Thanks, 113ADP68 (talk) 23:50, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments: G'day, 113ADP68, thank you for your efforts so far. I had a quick look and have a few suggestions. Unfortunately, I don't know much about the topic, so I can only give you general advice, I'm sorry: AustralianRupert (talk) 11:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * the lead probably needs expansion to adequately summarise the whole article - probably two or three paragraphs in this instance
 * in the lead, link "Axis", "Allies", "Vichy France" etc.
 * link Vichy France on first mention
 * in the References, avoid using all caps per MOS:ALLCAPS
 * where Churchill and Roosevelt -- add full names and wikilinks on first mention, and explain who these people were
 * In the lead up to the beginning of World War II --> "In the lead up to World War II"
 * Sultan Mohammad V: --> remove the colon here as it isn't necessary
 * same as above for Medical care on the Moroccan frontier:
 * are there any photographs that can be added? I would suggest adding one to the lead, and a couple more in the body of the article. Commons is likely to have some
 * I suggest maybe adding an Aftermath section to discuss the lasting impacts, if there were any (e.g on society, the economy, etc)
 * wikilink "Operation Torch" on first mention
 * General Schaeffer: full name and wikilink (if one exists) on first mention
 * many rapings and killings --> "many rapes and murders"?
 * in the mediterranean theatre --> capitalise "Mediterranean"
 * Mount Cassino --> "Monte Cassino"? Also, I suggest wikilinking the article on the battle here
 * add a wikilink for "Gustav line"...overall, I think there are probably quite a few terms or names that need wikilinking in the article, so I would suggest checking for these throughout (add a link first time the term or name is mentioned, if the subject is notable)
 * overall, I'd suggest you list the article for a copy edit over at WP:GOCE, so that you can get another set of eyes on it
 * anyway, that's it from me. Good luck with developing it further.