Wikipedia:Peer review/NDA (song)/archive1

NDA (song)


I've listed this article for peer review since I'm not English native speaker, so I'd like to see how many typos I've left. Or just, I'd like to ask if my sentences make sense or should they be reworked in some way. And I'm planning to nominate it one day for featured article status, and I simply would like to know what work is left to do so.

Thanks, inf sai  ( talkie?  UwU) 00:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Elias
Leaving this as a placeholder of sorts. I've worked a bit on "Happier Than Ever" with a goal of bringing it to FA quality, so I'm also interested in seeing how I can improve this one. Will get back to this in two weeks, when I have the most free time. Please don't mind pinging me in every reply as I often forget things after sending them :") ‍ ‍ elias. 🧣 ‍  ‍ 💬reach out to me 📝see my work 10:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

📝see my work 06:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 📝see my work 08:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Infsai, hello again! I have some free time today - will be glad to start looking at the sourcing for this. Since this would be your first featured article nomination, I would have to conduct a comprehensive review of the references used to the article. Per the criteria, sources must be of high quality, and directly supports the statements to which it is cited. "High quality" in FAC means that the source has rigorous editorial standards, the author has a background in music journalism or has bylines in other reliable publications, is used by other reliable publications and deemed a reliable source, etc. ‍ ‍ elias. 🧣 ‍  ‍ 💬reach out to me
 * Began in talk. ‍ ‍ elias. 🧣 ‍  ‍ 💬reach out to me