Wikipedia:Peer review/NMDA receptor antagonist/archive1

NMDA receptor antagonist
Please give any tips that might improve this article to GA status or A-Class status. Jolb 01:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * At first glance, it looks as though the lead could be either expanded or the facts in it could be combined into paragraphs better, or both. Citations look good. The list of 'see also' templates is unsightly.  There is a way to combine all of them under one template, just keep listing them and put a '|' between each one. Wrad 04:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

User:SpecialWindler
Some quick easy pointers to make it a better article
 * The lead needs to be expanded, probably into two paragraphs.
 * More detail WP:LEAD
 * The "Neuroscience Portal" should be below in the "See Also" section
 * You should perhaps have a "external links" section
 * "neurotransmitters" & "psychedelics" in the see also section should be capatalised.
 * Does the picture really need to be that big?
 * And does the summary need to be so long and complicated.
 * The section "Examples" should be a sub section of "Pharmacology of blockade" there fore have three equal signs rather than two.
 * If it is not a sub category of Pharmacy of blockade, what are the examples of...
 * In "Examples" there is a list at the start with 10 Uncompetitive channel blockers, perhaps you could elaborate on what all of those are. People who don't know anything about them, arn'et really going to get it.
 * Some what like the "Noncompetitive antagonists" bit, which elaborates on which the are.
 * Try to avoid Red (dead) links.
 * Use bold to identify the name.
 * Your citing is fine.
 * I think you should explain what NMDA stands for, it is used quite frequently in the article, use it at the start of the article then use the initials
 * Example: North American Space Assosiation (NASA)
 * thats not what nasa stands for but
 * In the sentence, "They are used as anesthesia for animals and (less commonly) for humans, and some" use comers rather than brackets.
 * ... for animals and ,less commonly, for humans
 * there are quite short sections, perhaps expand them a little to provide greater detail.

SpecialWindler 09:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

After seeing what NMDA actually stands for, you may want to ignore my point about initials, but you still may want to refer to it. SpecialWindler 09:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I made a bunch of the changes you asked for here. Thanks for your help! Any further changes I should make? Jolb 16:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)