Wikipedia:Peer review/Nashville Sounds seasons/archive1

Nashville Sounds seasons

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2008.
 * DONE -NatureBoyMD (talk) 16:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * DONE -NatureBoyMD (talk) 16:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to make it a Featured List. Please respond with any suggestions for the list concerning ease of use/understanding, clarity, format, etc.

Thanks, NatureBoyMD (talk) 02:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here. Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Needs a copyedit - it is a "berth" in the postseason, not a "birth". I would also link Nashville in the lead somewhere.
 * DONE - NatureBoyMD (talk) 17:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Last sentence of the first paragraph needs a ref. I owuld also format the references consistenly - spell out access date, put p. in front of pages. The use of cite web may be help.
 * DONE -NatureBoyMD (talk) 23:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * How about a table of major league affiliations or including this in the existing tables?
 * DONE - Integrated with main table -NatureBoyMD (talk) 23:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Season-by-season attendance records table needs a ref
 * DONE - Attendance info is gone. NatureBoyMD (talk) 17:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

I am now very impressed with this list. I really like the way it's laid out; the last concern I have is the affiliations being merged into the main tables. If you'd like me to do it (I usually set them up colored and abbreviated), I could take care of that. Let me know here or on my talk page. KV5 •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  17:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * There's also a problem with the sorting; I can help you fix that as well if you need help. KV5  •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  17:25, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure of the best way to integrate affiliations. I'd appreciate it if you'd do it. What is the sorting problem? -NatureBoyMD (talk) 17:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I will take care of the former problem after I get home today. As for the latter, the finishes sort 1, 12, 13, 14, 2, 3, 4... etc. It happens. There is a help section on sorting. KV5  •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  17:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I see. There is also a problem with the GB columns. I looked at the help section, but it left me utterly confused. Your help here will be greatly appreciated. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Check it out, it should work now. Affiliates have been included but I couldn't get them colored the way I wanted. No big deal. KV5  •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  22:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It looks good. Thanks for your help. What do you think about the references? Are the sources acceptable? The team article FAC ran into some problems with too may refs coming from the team's website or media guide and refs from The Baseball Cube. I still have a little work to do on them. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 17:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Only 3 refs out of 19 from official sources is perfectly fine with me. KV5  •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  19:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * One more quick thing: FL reviewers will bust you down for your opening sentence. The "this list" sentence should be moved later on in the lead paragraph or removed altogether (see Philadelphia Phillies seasons for an example). Let me know when you take this to FL on my talk. KV5  •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  23:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * DONE - I reworded the lead prose. Thanks for the heads-up, your other comments, and help with the tables. I'll be sure to let you know when I nominate it. I want to wait for the end of the season and a pass/fail decision on the team article FAC first. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 00:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)