Wikipedia:Peer review/Neo-Mitochondrial Creatures/archive1

Neo-Mitochondrial Creatures
I have constructed this article myself, and despite having (clearly) fictional basis, I would like to hear critsism about the look, "feel", set-up, and its overall construction. Surprisingly, no one else has edited the page after I created it, and I thought that maybe that meant nothing was "wrong with it". Finally, I'd like to know what the community thinks of this article as well as my projects as a whole so far. Thanks! -MegamanZero 18:13 29,November 2005 (UTC)

Good effort so far. — Wackymacs 18:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Here are my comments:
 * 1) List the references you used to write this article (websites, articles, newspapers, etc etc)
 * 2) The lead paragraph should summarize the article, one sentence is too short.
 * 3) Image captions aren't great, could be improved.
 * 4) Images also need moving so they start at the top, and don't create a load of empty space at the end of the article as they do now.
 * 5) More context would be good, the article is a bit short.


 * In ordeer:

Thank you for the suggestions. -MegamanZero 23:41 1,Decemer 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) No problem. I'll handle that right away.
 * 2) Okay, any suggestions how I should format it..?
 * 3) Could you explain why they aren't that great..? I'll be glad to change them.
 * 4) Done.
 * 5) I need someone more versed in the Parasite Eve games -could you help me find someone..? Even though, however, there's not much to tell...they're simple video game enemies. =)

Resubmitted request as of March 29 :

Much has happened since the previous peer review. I've become a different, more experienced editor, I've cited resources, done various clean-up, and more information has been inserted for inclusion. A final opinion before I inquire featured article status would be lovely. And, please, don't just make suggestions, feel free to edit if you see a qualm that needs adressing. This is a wiki after all. -ZeroTalk 15:12, 29 March 2006 (UTC)