Wikipedia:Peer review/Neo-Renaissance/archive1

Neo-Renaissance
Good article which the WikiProject Architecture would like to see improved.--Mcginnly 23:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.


 * Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.


 * Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
 * This has been fixed thanks to bobblewik's tool. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * There may be an applicable infobox for this article. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)


 * Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -  between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18&amp;nbsp;mm.


 * Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL.
 * Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.
 * Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.


 * As is done in WP:FOOTNOTE, for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change blah blah [2]. to blah blah.[2]


 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
 * You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
 * Thanks, Andy t 00:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Could I just point out, this is in fact one of a series of pages on 19th century revival styles which like this page are still under construction. A collaboration between Ghirla and myself. This is still being researched, and is a long way from completion. Hence PR, or indeed any other form of review is very premature! Giano | talk 10:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I second Giano here. Please give us some time. -- Ghirla -трёп-  10:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)