Wikipedia:Peer review/Neptune/archive3

Neptune
Peer review/Neptune/archive1

Peer review/Neptune/archive2

This planet is one of the few who is still not at FA-status. I believe that with a few small updates it could reach it. Please help with some feedback.Nergaal 19:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 00:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Please address my objections from the previous FAC failure. Thank you. &mdash; RJH (talk) 21:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Looking at the FA's of other planets, I don't think this article has enough prose, and it definitely has too many images compared to the amount of prose. --HansHermans 20:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure the amount of prose is indicative of any kind of short coming. Comprehensiveness is what ultimately counts. Wisdom89 22:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Just a cursory glance of the article reveals some potential problems - Citation necessary tags are present. Moreover, there are whole sections without citations: Case in point, when comparing Neptune to Uranus. Those sort of things need to be fixed before FAC can be considered. Wisdom89 06:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)