Wikipedia:Peer review/New Jersey Supreme Court/archive2

New Jersey Supreme Court

 * (Previous peer review: Peer review/New Jersey Supreme Court/archive1)

This underwent a previous peer review (See above) and most of the suggestions were implemented, and then a FAC (Featured article candidates/New Jersey Supreme Court/archive1), which failed disasterously. I've attempted to address most of the issues from the FAC but would like another inspection of this articel by other sets of eyes, especially concerning the list of cases (How should they be presented? by case?/by sbject?, how much detail, etc). Finally, is there anything missing, or something that would drastically improve the articel or make it more interesting? 68.39.174.238 03:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 01:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: I am responding to concerns raised by the peerreviewer.js on the page linked to above. Other comments (placed here), will be answered here.

Note! I've hacked together an infobox for this court to summarize some highlights of current operation. I'd definately like to see what people have to say about IT, as it significantly changes the look of the intro. 68.39.174.238 10:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)