Wikipedia:Peer review/Nicholas C. Rowley/archive1

Nicholas C. Rowley
I've listed this article for peer review because… This is one of my first articles and am looking for any peer feedback. Thanks, BME917 (talk) 21:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments from User:KJP1
A few thoughts on what I think are the article's major issues:
 * Neutral point of view - It isn't a Neutral article, reading much more as a publicity piece than a balanced appraisal of the subject's importance and career. A quick google search,  suggests a more balanced view of the subject's career could be written.
 * Citations - Many are not independent sources. Nearly half, including the first three, come from websites directly linked to the subject of the article.  This includes the very first, which asserts the subject's notability.  You really can't use the subject's own website as the source for the claim that he is "one of the most successful attorneys in United States history."
 * Photograph - I see you are the author of the photograph of the subject. This may suggest a personal connection, although it may not.  If there is a personal connection between yourself and the subject, you should be clear about this to avoid any suggestion of a COI.
 * Use of subject's first name - to refer to the subject as "Nick" throughout the article comes across as informal and unencyclopedic, and again suggests a closeness between the subject and the author of the article.
 * Incorrect formatting - Four of the citations, 1, 9,10 and 15 are incorrectly formatted.
 * Citation 16 - This leads to a defunct website.
 * Broad Coverage - The bulk of the article comprises, in effect, two lists - his accolades and his notable cases. Where was he born, where educated, where does he live, does he have family, etc. etc.?
 * Prose - "awarded his family with a verdict of $40,000,000.00." I'm not a lawyer, but does a jury award with a verdict? And is $40M a verdict?  Isn't the verdict the decision, i.e. the liability or otherwise of the company being sued, and the degree of liability; and the $40M the award?


 * Hope these comments are helpful. Regards.  KJP1 (talk) 08:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)