Wikipedia:Peer review/Nickel Creek/archive1

Nickel Creek
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because it is a recent good article, and I would like to eventually get it to FA status. Any comments or suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Thamusemeantfan (talk) 03:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

dihydrogen monoxide

 * Lead should really be in a few paragraphs. Look at Powderfinger, Silverchair, etc. for a general model
 * It's really not sorted very well at the moment...
 * You don't need refs in the infobox
 * Refs that use web.archive should have this noted (using |archivedate= in cite web, etc.)
 * Early days: 1989–1999 section is also a bit jumbled up...
 * No more info on the first 2 albums?
 * Copyvio issues with that much quoting
 * "Critics responded favorably to the album, with All Music Guide giving it four and a half stars out of five." - don't use (plural) critics if you only cite one, and get a ref for that one
 * Is it possible to photoshop the date/time off the bottom right corner of Image:NickelCreek.jpg?
 * "Charles Spano of All Music Guide said that" - any non-AMG reviews?
 * A few short paras in the This Side: 2002–2004 section could be merged
 * "Sean Watkins stated that all three members were ready" - refer to him by surname, and no need to wlink
 * I will unlink it, but I can not just use the surname because Sara Watkins is also a member of the band. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 00:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Still needs a bit of work before FAC. Gimme a yell when you're done with this and I'll try to take another look if I get the chance. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 07:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * "planned the Farewell (For Now) Tour" - tours don't go in italics (a few others in the article...)