Wikipedia:Peer review/Old Dan Tucker/archive1

Old Dan Tucker
I just expanded this article from a stub and would like feedback, particularly from those who know about music and musicology. Does the article flow correctly? What needs to be done before it is ready for WP:FAC? Thanks, — BrianSmithson 08:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Auto peer review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, BrianSmithson 05:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
 * Nope. — BrianSmithson 06:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -  between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18&amp;nbsp;mm.
 * Fixed. — BrianSmithson 06:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
 * Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “ All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
 * Fixed. — BrianSmithson 06:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
 * Fixed. — BrianSmithson 06:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
 * Copy edited the best I can. — BrianSmithson 06:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)