Wikipedia:Peer review/Open-source license/archive1

Open-source license


I've listed this article for peer review because I'm planning to nominate for GA review soon. Feedback of any type is welcome. A few places where I'd like to get outside input are: [a] Some licenses/cases have the primary source cited as well; does that help others with verification, or should I just omit those? [b] Are there places where I've over-explained anything? [c] And are there places where a deeper explanation is needed.

Thanks, Rjjiii  (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments from Z1720
After a quick skim, I do not notice any immediate problems. I think this can be nominated to GAN as-is and a reviewer will take a closer look. A minor quibble: typically the lede doesn't have in-text citations, so if this information is in the body of the article these citations can be removed. Z1720 (talk) 20:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Rjjiii  (talk) 03:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)