Wikipedia:Peer review/Organizational commitment/archive1

Organizational commitment
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because we have been assigned as a group to improve the quality of this wikipedia page. Any suggestions about how to make our edits better would be much appreciated. We are all new to this and are a little unsure if what we are doing is always correct. We are open to any and all suggestions and constructive criticism for our page.

Thanks, Cmchildress (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)cmchildressCmchildress (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments The Rambling Man (talk) 17:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Avoid all the overcapitalisation. "Organizational Behavior" mid-sentence is not a pair of proper nouns, so shouldn't be capitalised.  Check throughout.
 * "future research.” [1] " two things here, first put the ref directly after the punctuation (i.e. no space) and second, use " rather than ” per WP:PUNC.
 * "by Kanter (1968)[citation needed])." fix, and the other ones.
 * "Affective Commitment" overcapitalised.
 * If you use "AC" as an abbreviation, put (AC) after the first use of it in prose.
 * "found a correlation of 0.73 between" I think you need to explain this kind of thing in more detail.
 * "Cmchildress (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)cmchildressCmchildress (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)" remove your own signature from the page!
 * Refs 1-3 are the same, so use for the first one then for the subsequent refs.
 * Use an en-dash per WP:DASH in the refs for page ranges, year ranges etc.
 * Formatting issues on the last three references.
 * You have a red-linked category, usually these aren't a good idea unless you're going to populate the new category with several more articles.