Wikipedia:Peer review/Oxford/archive1

Oxford
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to know how it could be improved.

Thanks, TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 14:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Some basic suggestions to get you going. There's a lot you can do already but feel free to get in touch if you need more advice. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments from
 * Check out Navenby. It just recently made featured status and is a good model to base your editing on.
 * Expand the lead, per WP:LEAD.
 * You have several sections which are simply bullet lists. For GA or FA you should be looking to make this into engaging or even brilliant prose.
 * Go easy on the images, on my browser, some actually overlap. Judicious use and placement so as not to go over the top should be considered.
 * For some of the commercial areas, just select the major ones to discuss, no need to list every single area. Same with cinemas and theatres - this isn't an alamanac, it's an encyclopaedia so it should really contain only items of note with justification.
 * More citations are needed, see Navenby for a good example of how many you'd expect in a featured article!