Wikipedia:Peer review/PAUX/archive1

PAUX
The article might be too complicated. It's quite a complex issue, but maybe somebody can help. WissenVeredeln 18:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)WissenVeredeln
 * Oh, there are many issues for a non-technical reader to spot. No references, not even a section. And a listy-thing in the introduction. Both of these major issues need to be fixed right away. -Fsotrain09 21:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, and these references need to show it meets WP:SOFTWARE, or it's likely to be nominated for deletion at some point. Sandstein 17:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Ruhrfisch 03:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)