Wikipedia:Peer review/Pantheism/archive1

Pantheism
This article is a mess. It doesn't explain well what are the believes of Pantheists, but instead focus on showing how the other religions may be considered Pantheistic, or whatever. Actually, the article has a lot of biased arguments and lack of focus on what's supposed to be saying. If there are other editors with a bit of time in their hands, please improve this article through the peer review system.-- Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves talk / contribs (please join WP:PT or WP:SPOKEN) 19:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Based on your statement, it appears that you are attempting to resolve a content dispute and recruit new editors. These are two endeavors for which WP:Peer review is poorly equipped to assist.  For dealing with the content issues, your first step in resolving the dispute it to raise your concerns on the article's talk page.  As for recruiting additional editors, you should try contacting the various Wikiprojects associated with this article. --Allen3 talk 10:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


 * What in tarnatation? No, I'm not recruiting editors.  I merely wanted some experienced editors to sit down and discuss how to improve this article and remove some of the biased and unsourced statements to actually create an encyclopedic article.  I seem to have failed to understand that Peer Review only applies to so-called "high-quality" articles, which wouldn't happly in this case.  My bad.-- Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves  talk / contribs (please join WP:PT or WP:SPOKEN) 10:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Alot is lacking or out of order.... it should start with the ancients (Thales to Xenophanes) but with caution that the ancients said much that can be mischaracterized as PanTheism, but is not quite it.... they were not so sophisticated, never shared all ideals of modern PanTheism.... then into Vedic concepts of unknowable date of origin.... this should precede Eurocentric developments.... there's no mention of Johannes Scotus Eriugena and his PanTheistic De Divisione Naturae, condemned by the Church for such an interpretation of Christianity.... this was sometime in the 800s, and was really the last word on PanTheism to the 1500s with Giordano Bruno and Jakob Boehme.... they set the stage for Spinoza's dissection and Toland's popularization of the idea, which is what we have as PanTheism today!! //// Pacific PanDeist * 02:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 04:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)