Wikipedia:Peer review/Parrot/archive1

Parrot
I wanted to get this to GA a long while ago, but then I forgot for some reason I don't remember. How is the article, do you think?

Thanks,  User:Dunkleosteus77 &#124;push to talk 20:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am new to this, but have noticed that one of the paragraphs under trade (which is under relationship with humans) ends without a citation.Qwerty number1 (talk) 23:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm a major contributor and I think it's solid but still a ways off. There is still some missing content, for example there is nothing about wings and flight in the morphology section; distribution and habitat is just distribution at this point; breeding is pretty thin, in fact there is more content seemingly for relationship with humans than behaviour. I think with some work it could get there and it's worthwhile (I've always thought its an important article which is why I've added quite a lot to it) so am happy to work on a more comprehensive work needed if you'd like (and also help with it). Sabine's Sunbird  talk  08:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure. Something’s just come up in real life so I’m gonna be a little slow to edit for the foreseeable future, but I’m happy to work with you  User:Dunkleosteus77 &#124;push to talk 14:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Well on flight, I got this on New World parrots, but I'm not exactly sure what to make of it, and I assume flight isn't that different from other birds? Flight's specific to habitat, I should think, so it should vary from species to species  User:Dunkleosteus77 &#124;push to talk 01:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * There's some general observations in HBW that I'll add. Sabine's Sunbird  talk  07:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * As for the Distribution and habitat and Breeding sections, they seem complete to me. Anything more would just be overkill I should think  User:Dunkleosteus77 &#124;push to talk 00:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If I am right, the Rose-ringed parakeet is found, albeit not natively, in Britain and other European nations. Isn't this further north than South USA? Qwerty number1 (talk) 14:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * to explain I am referring to 'have lived as far north as the southern United States', which seems an odd wording, since this seems to suggest this is basically the furthest north, while it is nowhere near? Qwerty number1 (talk) 14:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Typically when describing distribution it is done so in terms of natural range. The New World quails are endemic to the Americas, even if a few species have been introduced to various places. Thusly the natural (former) northernmost point of their distrubution was the southern US. Sabine's Sunbird  talk  08:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)