Wikipedia:Peer review/Peter Aduja/archive1

Peter Aduja
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I would like others to provide suggestions to edits, prior to nominating this article as a good article.

Thanks, RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments: Interesting article on a deceased politician who is no longer alive. (having stumbled here from my Peer Review) Hope that's helpful, and good luck! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) NOTE: Please respond, below all my comments, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
 * 2) Checklinks tool shows a few problems throughout with links and slow links. I strongly suggest archiving as many as possible with added parameters archiveurl= and archivedate= with Internet Archive links.
 * 3) Per WP:LEAD, consider expanding the lede intro sect, (four paragraphs), so it may function as a standalone summary of the entire article's contents.
 * 4) 1 image used in the article. Suggest contacting people to try to obtain a free-use licensed image to upload to Wikimedia Commons through the commons:Commons:OTRS process.
 * 5) A few one-sentence-long-paragraphs and other short paragraphs throughout, consider expanding and/or merging them up.
 * 6) This is an article primarily pertaining to United States. Please convert to USA date formatting in both body text and in citations.
 * 7) Remove Biography sect header, not needed.
 * 8) Move Family info up to new top sect, Early life and family, and then put beginning info in Biography sect, in that new sect.
 * 9) Try expanding all portions of the entire article with additional sourced content from more secondary sources. Surely there's more sourced info available on this individual then is present in this relatively small article at present.
 * 10) Not sure cites are needed for all those little things in the infobox itself, as it's noncontroversial info, just make sure it's mentioned and cited in the main article body text.
 * 11) NOTE: Please respond, below all my comments, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
 * , thanks once again for reviewing the article. I have made the following edits to the article as suggested above. I have not changed the dates per WP:STRONGNAT, due to the subject having once served as a Soldier. I don't believe that this should significantly impact a GA nomination. I have merged some sentences, and incorporated the data from the family section. Unfortunately, there aren't many sources that give the subject significant coverage, even though the subject's first election was a very notable milestone in the political history of Filipino Americans.
 * Are there any other additional corrections I should make?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)