Wikipedia:Peer review/Petitcodiac River/archive1

Petitcodiac River
This peer review discussion has been closed. I'm getting this article ready for an FAC, and as a result, I would highly appreciate a peer review to iron out the kinks. A copy edit has been requested as well, but I anticipate it to be complete before the PR and has been completed. Anyhow, thanks in advance, and I'll take any advice I can get! Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  00:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Sandman888 (talk) Latest PR 14:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * References
 * When short-citing, please divide in General and Specific content, makes it easier to see where the repetitive references are from.
 * Better?
 * Works cited comes before notes. Sandman888 (talk) Latest PR 06:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. I'm also going to add anchor links to the footnotes in a few.
 * Lead
 * The lead should not have any references in them. If anything is not references later it should then be repeated in main.
 * This has been under debate. WP:LEADCITE gives (what I find to be) a vague explanation to proceed, and there have been recent discussions on reforming the current rules. I do not want to remove everything I've done if it is later decided to be a bad move, so I'll take it to FAC with citations; unless I'm misunderstanding the concept of the guideline.
 * tributaries, wl
 * I'm not familiar with PR lingo, but I assume it meant wiki-link. Done.
 * % -> percent
 * Eliminated a few instances, left for numerals > 10.
 * Lists
 * Why do we need to know where all the crossings are? Seems irrelevant.
 * Just following the example of Aliso Creek (Orange County).
 * IS it a FA and was the subject brought up in the FAC?
 * It is an FA, and I don't see any mention at the nomination. WP:RIVER also recommends the list.
 * Cultural references
 * These section are not encouraged, could it be deleted?
 * Done.
 * Extra
 * Petitcodiac River Causeway - cd this article be deleted as your summary is much better or do you plan on expanding it?
 * WP:ATD -> Done.


 * Seems good. By the way it is considered rude to strike the reviewers comments, I do not mind but don't do it at the FAC :) Sandman888 (talk) Latest PR 06:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I never really thought it would be considered rude. Thanks, and thanks for the review! Eric Leb 01 (Page &#124; Talk)  15:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC)