Wikipedia:Peer review/Pichilemu/archive1

Pichilemu
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because the article have images, is bigger and i think that would be an featured article.

Thanks,  MisterWiki  talking! :-D  - 21:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * This article is not close to featured status, and wouldn't yet qualify for good article. For a comparable article of featured status, see El Hatillo Municipality, Miranda, which gives you an idea of what to work towards.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 21:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Ruhrfisch comments: Agree totally with Sandy and would add that I am not sure this would make "Start" class - probably still a "Stub" (lowest class). The good news is that means there is lots of room to improve. here are some suggestions: Hope this helps, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 16:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Need lots of content. Put the minimal information present into context - see WP:PCR. Explain what the things listed in the Old buildings and places section are.
 * Need lots of references - see WP:CITE, WP:V. For example the claim that The beach of Pichilemu is considered one of the world's best ones for practicing surfing, specifically the sector of Punta de Lobos, where competitions are frequently held. needs a citation - who says this?
 * Once you add more content and refs, get some help with copyedits - there are numerous grammar and spelling errors now.
 * The map seems odd - the Pacific Ocean should be to the west and if north is at the top, then the land would be on the right side and the ocean on the left. The map shows the reverse, but is not itself a reversed map. It is also in Spanish, but this is the English Wikipedia, so the labels should be English (obviously keep street names etc. in Spanish). So "Bosque Municipal" would be City Forest perhaps?


 * Thanks. I'm going to improve this article. -- MisterWiki  talking! :-D  - 20:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC)