Wikipedia:Peer review/Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides/archive1

Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because… the film recently started production, and thus warranted its own article. For it to be included in the POTC Good Topic, it needs a peer review. I'm willing to hear all comments and suggestions.

Thanks, igordebraga ≠ 01:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I would wait until the film is released (so a reception and box office data can be included) before nominating it for a good topic or good article -- so the article will feel more "complete". The article will go through many changes once the film is release, good or bad.

Comments by User:MikeAllen

External links and dablinks

 * There are a few dablinks that need disambiguated. See here.
 * Check links all look good.

Film Infobox

 * English language should not be linked.

Lead

 * There could be a paragraph included dedicated to the production of the film.
 * Adding references to the lead should be avoided that are uncontroversial. The release date is already linked, or should be in the "Release" section (see "Production" below).

Plot

 * This summary is a direct copy and paste of this. It should either be in quotations, or better yet, summarized into your own words.

Cast

 * There should a cite next to each entry (even using the same citation from the casting section for each entry will suffice) since it's likely to be challenged. The cast list tends to invite newer editors and IPs to add unsourced or rumored cast (usually copied from IMDb and they have disclaimer that reads, "Because this project is categorized as being in production, the data is subject to change; some data could be removed completely.") . Or you could just eliminate the cast list altogether and just rely on the prose in the "Casting" section. ;-)

Production

 * This whole section would look better as level 2 header: "Production", followed by level 3 headers: "Development", "Writing", "Casting", "Filming". I was listing what could go where, but found it much easier to do it myself in my sandbox and show it to you already done.  See here.  The way it was laid out in the article is rather confusing and inconsistent.

Marketing

 * This is unsourced and should be removed or have the tag next to it. It would also fit better under the "Release" section.