Wikipedia:Peer review/Pokemon articles seem to be about nonfictional animals/archive1

Pokemon articles seem to be about nonfictional animals
Beedrill, Butterfree - these articles have nothing in the first paragraph that states they are fictional. This seems to me like "Sherlock Holmes was one of the world's greatest detectives, and may have killed the arch-fiend Moriarty"... I think the whole pokemon constellation needs a look with this in mind. I'm not that sure what a pokemon IS, but it isn't a real thing...66.245.208.146 04:13, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Well I fixed those two. Just simply note in the intro that they are fictional characters.  The fans of these things won't appreciate that, but they have to reallize that not saying they are fictional first thing is being misleading. You don't need peer review for these, just go fix them.  Since this listing is not what this page is for, I'll remove this to Wikipedia:Peer review (to be deleted) in a couple days, or you can first. - Taxman 17:38, Sep 24, 2004 (UTC)