Wikipedia:Peer review/Politics and Prose/archive1

Politics and Prose
I'm considering going through WP:FAC for the first time ever, and I'd love to have a full peer review done before I jump into the lion's den. Specifically I'd love for the article to be compared against the featured article criteria.

Thanks, Nomader (talk) 17:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by Eddie891
FA criteria: I am not sure about the others. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is—
 * 2) well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
 * 3) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
 * 4) well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature. Claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
 * 5) neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; and
 * 6) stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process. ✅
 * 7) It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of—
 * 8) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
 * 9) appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings;✅ and
 * 10) consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes    or Harvard referencing  (Smith 2007, p. 1) ✅—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. The use of citation templates is not required.
 * 11) Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions, and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. ✅
 * 12) Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style. ✅
 * Thanks, Eddie! Nomader (talk) 17:24, 15 December 2017 (UTC)