Wikipedia:Peer review/Politics of Harry Potter/archive1

Politics of Harry Potter

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because it has recently been accused of bias, and since it falls under WP:BLP, I felt it should be addressed by the wider community.

Thanks,  Serendi pod ous  06:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I will take a closer look at it over the week, but at a quick read-through I will venture this. It seems to me that there is a general failure to distinguish between 'the politics of harry potter' and 'harry potter in politics'. you should have a clearly delimited section that talks about what political metaphors and references Rowland did (and didn't) build into her story lines.  you can then have a separate section that talks about the interpretations that various political actors have made of it.  this should clear up any implication of bias, since none of the third-party interpretations will be confused with Rowland's own acts.  --Ludwigs2 (talk) 02:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)