Wikipedia:Peer review/Porcupine (album)/archive1

Porcupine (album)

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I've substantially re-written it over the last few weeks and I'm aiming to nominate it for GA status.

Thanks, JD554 (talk) 13:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Giggy comments
 * This isn't far off GA standards.
 * The audio sample captions need more detail, to show how they're being used educationally (and it needs to relate to the text).
 * Fixed
 * Some of the reviews in the reception section aren't in the infobox... be consistent.
 * Fixed
 * First sentence of article should mention genre.
 * Fixed
 * "it became the band's highest charting release when it reached number two on the UK Albums Chart despite initially receiving poor reviews." - probably put a comma before 'despite"
 * Fixed
 * "Following a difficult period writing Porcupine, it was recorded at Trident Studios in London, Rockfield Studios in South Wales and Amazon Studios in Liverpool." - I think it'd read better if you removed a bit... "following a difficult writing period, Porcupine was recorded..."?
 * Fixed
 * I hope these comments help. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Cheers, giggy (O) 03:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, --JD554 (talk) 06:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)