Wikipedia:Peer review/Postmature birth/archive1

Postmature birth

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for November 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for November 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I need it to be edited for its general quality.

Thanks, HannahSharpe (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments ErikvDijk (talk)
 * I've done a quick copy edit and added some wikilinks (links of words to other articles put around the word you want to link ), but there are more therms that need links for further information. Only link once per therm per article though.
 * In general the article is well sourced. However in a number of places the tone of the writing should be more in line with an encyclopedia and not support page for women for instance: sections "How It's Done" and "What it feels like" and "risks" are not really encyclopedic. Try to write them in a more formal tone.
 * How is Post mature diagnosed? Just by noting time after supposed gestation? This not clearly mentioned?
 * Is there really nothing know about the causes?
 * I guess that apart from not knowing last menstruation also an irregular cycle can result in uncertain determination of gestation, correct?
 * In the section "Symptoms", it might be good to indicate that these symptoms can only be seen after birth.
 * How is a "Biophysical Profile" performed?

I hope that these comments help. ErikvDijk (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)