Wikipedia:Peer review/Presbyterian Ladies' College, Sydney/archive3

Presbyterian Ladies' College, Sydney


This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because… it was promoted to GA in November and I think it could potentially be an FA, however I am not really sure what else needs to be done to improve it. Would appreciate any suggestions/criticisms.

Thanks, Loopla (talk) 06:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Twenty Years Review

 * In the lead, it has a reference for the sentence; The Presbyterian Ladies' College, Sydney (P.L.C. Sydney), is an independent, Presbyterian, day and boarding school for girls, located in Croydon, an inner-western suburb of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.[9], the reference for that is not needed, its not controversial.
 * In the fees section it states; P.L.C Sydney offers scholarships and bursaries that provide all or part remission of tuition fees to students who are Australian citizens. I think it would sound better with all replaced by full, so it reads; P.L.C Sydney offers scholarships and bursaries that provide full or part remission of tuition fees to students who are Australian citizens.
 * In the fees section, it states: As with all Australian independent schools, P.L.C is not a full fee paying institution, due to it receiving limited government funding, i think the statement is false, there are schools in Australia that receive no govt funding. Also i dislike the use of the word limited in that sentence, is there a reference for it?
 * I dislike the quote in the Foundation section of History by the NSW Governor. I think it is too long, and might be better placed elsewhere in the article.
 * Dislike the list of buildings in the Campus section. Some of them are clearly notable for being heritage listed, but most are clearly non-notable and dont need to be in the article.
 * Other than that, i think the article is v/good. Probably ready for FAC. Twenty Years 07:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 15:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)