Wikipedia:Peer review/Pro-choice/archive1

A review of Pro-choice is needed. The original article lacked among other things


 * a reading list
 * footnotes
 * a definition
 * a critique
 * comparative analysis
 * sources
 * mention of anywhere other than the United States.
 * an accurate summary of Roe versus Wade
 * neutral links

A rewrite was done to fix these and other deficiencies. However two users reverted back to an earlier version that lacks all of the above (and more). The rewrite is in situ again. A peer review is needed of it to see if it forms the basis for a comprehensive article on the topic. FearÉIREANN \(caint)|undefined 01:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)