Wikipedia:Peer review/Project Apollo/archive2

Project Apollo
Seeing as this is a historically significant article, I would like to try and get it up to FA or at least GA status. I nominated this for PR in May 2006 (Peer review/Project Apollo/archive1), and FAC shortly after that (Featured article candidates/Project Apollo, but the FAC nomination failed. I would like to try this process again, but I would like some advice on further improving it first. -- GW_SimulationsUser Page 23:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I've been working on it too, but only got a couple of sections into it before real life commitments intervened. At the moment I would say it needs a fair amount of work before it can achieve GA status... it's really going to need a complete overhaul before being nominated as a FAC. I'll offer some more detailed thoughts later, but for the moment, just think citations, citations, citations. MLilburne 23:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, I think there are a few websites which could be useful for this, so I'll look into how these could possibly be used. -- GW_SimulationsUser Page 13:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Just be careful not to rely too heavily on websites. There is a whole series of NASA publications and history works available, and almost all of them are available online. MLilburne 15:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. -- GW_SimulationsUser Page 22:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)