Wikipedia:Peer review/Project M - Think Wrong/archive1

Project M - Think Wrong
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because Project M is a growing organization that has been doing a lot of good things. It has years of great press coverage to validate its work and is a leader in the "design for good" movement. It deserves a place on Wikipedia to serve as an all encompassing resource for all interested parties.

Thanks, Brianwjones (talk) 20:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

"Note: Peer review is backlogged at the moment, which could mean delays of up to two weeks before articles can be reviewed. You can help, by choosing one of the articles in the backlog, and reviewing it. Please consider doing this."

Peer Reviews are not for hiring editors to collaborate on worthy projects; they're to illicit comments as to the state of a particular article, to determine what needs to be done for improvement. While I admire the project's mission, the article is currently a stub, mostly composed of external links and an unsourced mission statement. It's not an article, per se, but more like an advertisement. As such, I've added the tag to the top of the page, although I could see how someone might nominate it for speedy deletion -- there's just nothing there, and the tone is slightly inappropriate and unencyclopedic. I don't believe the article has much to work with as far as a PR goes, and because there is currently a ginormous backlog here, I suggest this peer review be archived ASAP. María ( habla con migo ) 17:39, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments from Maria
 * Article deleted per CSD G11— will send to archive in a while . --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 00:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Archived. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 00:18, 4 May 2010 (UTC)