Wikipedia:Peer review/Puerto Rico/archive1

Puerto Rico
I believe the article is a good example of wikipedia contributions. The controversial issues have been resolved and the recent changes have been minor edits. I would like people to check the flow of the article, as well as politics and history sections, specially paying attention to NPOV. I hope that following peer review the article can be nominated for featured article status. Cjrs 79 14:45, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

Guettarda 15:03, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * It's a good start, but there are major issues that must be dealt with if you want to move this towards an FAC.
 * The History section is far too long, given that there is a subpage. The social and economic effects of the postwar changes should get some mention.  The Demographics section is also too long.
 * Geography, Geology and Economy are too short. The lack of a Culture section (beyond a list of links, many of which are dubiously "cultural") is a major problem, especially in the absence of a Culture subpage.
 * There are far too few references, and there is no way of tying them to the information on the page.


 * I agree with the references needing to be bulked up significantly. Having checked the references, the history section appears to be basically unsupported by the listed references.  The Municipalities section should also be looked at, it is little more than a list that is replicated by a template further down.  There is no need for the list and the template together. --Allen3 talk 15:57, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)


 * [The following is reformated to clarify it as being a one whole msg:]

_ _ This is currently listed under the Wikipedia article on Puerto Rico
 * According to the 2000 US Census, 95% of the population consider themselves of Puerto Rican descent (regardless of race or skin color), making Puerto Rico one of the most culturally homogenous societies in the world.

Yet, because Puerto Rico has never been its own country. It has been a territory of the US for years and it treated almost like a state. To say Puerto Rican is not as statement of nationality. It is almost the same as saying "New Yorker", "Georgian" or even "Californian". It does not tell ones ethnic heritage. _ _ Just like if one were to say they are a "New Yorker" is not defined by their skin color. _ _ This should be removed or should be clarified. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Meaceast (talk &bull; contribs) 17:30, 19 January 2006 (UTC)