Wikipedia:Peer review/Ralph Nader/archive1

Ralph Nader
Already a good article, but is it good enough to be featured? If not, Why? 11kowrom 23:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe a userbox may make it better.-- A n d e h 07:03, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you mean an infobox? As for the article, there are too many lists and short sections. Talk about his involvement in the most important organizations, mention his involvement in a few others, and ditch the rest.  Combine 1972, 1990, 1992 and 1996.  Do general cleanup.  Add more citations.  --Spangineer[es]  (háblame)  15:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)