Wikipedia:Peer review/Ravi Zacharias/archive1

Ravi Zacharias

 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've spent a lot of time working on this article and would like to get it up to FA status. I would like to know what could be improved on. For some of my own ideas, I would like to add more about Ravi Zacharias International Ministries as a whole (apologists involved, etc), along with Wellspring International and Ravi Zacharias Trust. I would be interested in knowing if this would warrant its own article or if it should be added here. Also Ravi Zacharias has co-written a lot of books with his colleagues and appeared on DVDs, which I would like to add to the list of works if this is warranted. Any other feedback is welcomed.

Thanks, Kristamaranatha (talk) 02:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * A few opinions, for what they might be worth:
 * Lead section could probably be expanded
 * If information on the subject's personal life is available outside of his ministry, I might add the relevant information on that as well
 * ✅ Might move the "Thought" section to after the "Ministry" section, or maybe try to integrate the two
 * Regarding your own suggestions above, if the RZIM and other groups are sufficiently notable as per WP:NOTABILITY and by amount of content to have reasonably detailed articles of their own, then that might be the best way to go. If not, content regarding those groups could certainly be added here. John Carter (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments from
 * You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FAC, and my first suggestion would be to get your references into order. A number of your website references lack publisher and/or last access dates, which are the bare minimum needed for WP:V. Books need publisher, author, and page number on top of title. When you've got those mostly straightened out, drop me a note on my talk page and I'll be glad to come back and look at the actual sources themselves, and see how they look in terms of reliability, like I would at FAC. 14:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * There are still a number of websites lacking publishers. Current refs 4 and 5 for a start. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * There are still a number of websites lacking publishers. Current refs 4 and 5 for a start. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)