Wikipedia:Peer review/Red rain in Kerala/archive2

Red rain in Kerala
For old peer review, see Peer review/Red rain in Kerala/archive1

I'm hoping to get this up to FA status for April 1 (April fools main page) so I would welcome some input as how best to achieve this Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I would suggest that you write up some fair use rationales for the images first.  bibliomaniac 1  5  04:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

=Nichalp  «Talk»=  06:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Review by =Nichalp   «Talk»=
 * Needs an SVG map
 * Images should be thumbed
 * Table should be right aligned. A pi chart of the data can be shown
 * Copyedit required. low content of phosphorus is puzzling , is by no means rare
 * Astrophysics and Space Science should be in italics
 * 4.1 and 6.1 sections are bad style. Merge with parent or promote to a higher level.
 * References should be preferably formatted using the citation templates available.
 * Dr. - remove
 * Populating red links should give the article a more professional touch
 * Remove low value linking (eg wells, rainwater, milligrams etc)
 * Gallery should go, merge images with text
 * What was the reaction of the local people? I'm sure such an unusual phenomena should cause some sort of consternation among the local populace, even giving rise to superstitions.
 * The following domains can also be combed for more information: gov.in, nic.in, ernet.in, gov ; and so too google news.