Wikipedia:Peer review/Rhapta/archive1

Rhapta
This article attracted a flurry of interest when it appeared on the Main Page as part of DYK, & saw a number of improvements -- but since then, it has sat almost untouched. As it now stands, does the article competently cover the topic? Are there any points that obviously need be added? Or has it remained stable for so long because it does a competent job? -- llywrch 03:07, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * It seems too short, given a biblography that long. Also, it would be a good idea to make it clear what parts of the article are coming from what sources. --Ryan Delaney talk 05:51, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The cinnamon stick image doesnt seem very relevant to the article, at least you could explain in the caption that they were traded there Astrokey44 14:22, 2 November 2005 (UTC)