Wikipedia:Peer review/Rockstar (2011 film)/archive1

Rockstar (2011 film)
This peer review discussion has been closed. The article has a good look and feel with all the relevant information that a film article should have. I want the article to be peer reviewed to get further inputs on improving the quality of the article article and going for a GAN.

Thanks, -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:08, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Avoid linking common terms like countries and languages, per WP:OVERLINK. ✅
 * I don't think so. Europe, Italy and quite a few are still linked.


 * Cast section does not require sources ✅
 * "As Ranbir and Kareena happened to be cousins, this would have been a problem." - Sounds like POV. "Was touted as a problem" would be better. ✅
 * Apply italics to "Rockstar" all over the article. ✅
 * "Nargis Fakhri" is linked more than once in the "Production" section. ✅
 * No, its once in a section, not in a sub-section.


 * "Kashmiri Pandit" linked more than once in the same. ✅
 * Same as above. Its not been done yet.


 * "Rockstar is a musical journey" - If it is quoted, add quotes, or re-write it neutrally. ✅
 * Remove the "see also" section (unnecessary): Have retained it, but only linking appropriate articles. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:40, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No no, the other two articles which you retained are already linked within it. Hence it should be deleted.


 * References are not formatted properly. Make sure they have these six fields : Date, author, accessdate, title, url and publisher. Apply italics to news media and do not overlink them. ✅
 * No again. For Box office India, the author is usually "BOI Trade Network". Add that to all the links. Missing details in refs 1 & 6.

I'll try a more detailed look soon. Secret of success  (talk) 06:15, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

More issues: Secret of success  (talk) 10:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Further comments
 * Why are half the dates italicized in the refs? ✅
 * Corrected. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:03, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Fix the mdy, dmy and ymd to a consistent format in refs. Based on a brief look, I see dmy being the common one, and I suggest the other two be converted to this. ✅
 * The plot summary in the lead does not seem to be adequately boil down the entire plot. Some irrelevant details like the canteen owner should be removed, and other missing relevant ones added. ✅
 * Mention a sentence about the controversies in the lead. ✅
 * Instead of putting up the awards for the individual category, just mention the ceremonies in the lead. In that way, all can be covered. ✅
 * Questionable reliability : 25, 56, 59. ✅
 * Removed a source, as it was replaceable by an existing source. Replaced another source with NDTV one. This source is very difficult to be replaced -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:39, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Saadda Haq, Rockstar.jpg does not have a proper rationale. Its replaceability parameter needs to be justified, its resolution must be reduced and its purpose needs to be elaborated to make it satisfy WP:NFCC. ✅
 * Even i had taught that it may bring up some issue, hence i have removed it now and added it to the song article. Will add some other screenshot in the polt section later, fine? -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:03, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Fine by me. You also might want to take a look at my response in the first set of comments above. Secret of success  (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2012 (UTC)