Wikipedia:Peer review/Rogers Act/archive1

Rogers Act
I've listed this article for peer review because… the person who put the template on the article's talk page didn't complete the process.

Thanks,

John Carter 16:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Intro needs to be lengthened. Individual quotations should be individually sourced. A little more information on the nature of the debate would be useful. The "Provisions" section should probably be converted into regular sentence format. John Carter 16:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for minor issues of grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)