Wikipedia:Peer review/RuneScape/archive2

RuneScape
To see old discussion, click here

I, along with some other contributors, wish to promote this article to a GA status, preferably FA. There has been an earlier Peer review for this, along with an archived FA unsuccessful omination and a GA review.

The previous reviews called for improvement in the section named "Criticisms", which now has been changed to "Feedback". The reviews called for adding citations in all feedback, and also called for a NPOV in all player criticisms. These issues have been taken care of by adding citations, adding press reviews, and adding both positive/negative player reviews, all of which have been cited.

I am specifically asking people to look over the article and comment on what else would be needed.Edtalk c E  19:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Automated suggestions are provided here, that you may wish to refer for some useful style guidelines. - Mailer Diablo 17:26, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Try to improve quality of references - Google Scholar and Print for them. Currently the article has no academic references, all that we have reviews, game news and official releases - hardly a very reliable source.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)