Wikipedia:Peer review/Ryzen/archive1

Ryzen
I am going make this simple. I've listed this article for peer review because…

Technical tag and Fan tag should been dated since 2017. Thanks, Regice2020 (talk) 21:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Ryzen article became too technical for most readers to understand each time a new information released for new Ryzen Processors that`s comes out.
 * Too much AMD fanboys being too excited and putting their "fans point of view" mixed inside the information in this article. This articles should be more focus on AMD Ryzen the article and not get upset over fan based changes are being removed.

Comment
 * please note that this review has been added by a disruptive editor who even tried to have the article deleted with very similar BS reasons as given above. --Denniss (talk) 07:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The recent revert of a good faith edit from me by Denniss about tags was not properly reviewed. This "Peer Review" is not use to throw rocks at each other. Seeks improvement as stated in bullets and this been going on since 2017. Regice2020 (talk) 17:26, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The goal is to fix page up and stop people from preventing users from doing so.
 * Another note, the product lineup table on Ryzen article page already have a independent article for it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Ryzen_microprocessors to allow easier improvement and fixes. The table should of been removed from Ryzen page due to duplication.
 * When a proposal is made. It tends falls into WP:SNOW by specific AMD group like you see on news article about this processor.Proof of Fan Behavior Regice2020 (talk) 02:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)