Wikipedia:Peer review/Saturday Night Live/archive1

Saturday Night Live
This peer review discussion has been closed. I nominated this article for featured article without making major edits to the article like should be done, the debate of which can be found here. I thought a good first step to making Saturday Night Live a featured article would be starting this peer review and gathering consensus on quality, scope, depth, and appropriate references.

Thanks! StewdioMACK (talk) 09:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Comments (having stumbled here from my Peer Review) Hope that's helpful, and good luck! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) NOTE: Please respond, below all my comments, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
 * 2) Checklinks tool shows a few problems throughout with links and slow links. I strongly suggest archiving as many as possible with added parameters archiveurl= and archivedate= with Internet Archive links.
 * 3) I looked through all the images and they checked out okay.
 * 4) Five (5) citation needed tags in article at present -- but there are also more unsourced bits sprinkled throughout.
 * 5) Other incidents -- this seems sort of like a random list smacked together.
 * 6) Controversies sect -- would be best to do away with this sect entirely and work all that material, chronologically, into a History sect.
 * 7) Consider cutting down total use of quotations in article, instead paraphrasing where appropriate, this will help you later down the road at WP:FAC.
 * 8) Reception sect, might need to be updated with more current info.
 * 9) NOTE: Please respond, below all my comments, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!

Thanks for your comments, Cirt! Again, thanks for your help! StewdioMACK (talk) 14:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Will work on the citation needed tags. I'm having a hard time finding sources for some of that info, so I might have to remove some of it.
 * 2) I'm not sure how the Controversies and Other incidents could be worked into the history section, but if you have any suggestions, go ahead. Maybe these could even be its own article, with other mess-ups from the show.
 * 3) I looked for some more modern sources regarding Reception but unfortunately couldn't find much.