Wikipedia:Peer review/Saving Silverman/archive1

Saving Silverman
All elements of this article have been updated, expanded, cited, and improved, so the whole article is proposed for review. It may even qualify for Good Article status.--Lexein 14:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, xxpor  yo!|see what i've done 16:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.[?]
 * Consider adding more links to the article; per Manual of Style (links) and Build the web, create links to relevant articles.[?]
 * This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Image use policy and fit under one of the Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
 * See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
 * Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.[?]
 * Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): don't, don't, doesn't, can't.
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
 * This article needs a lot of work. There needs to be a "Development" section describing how the movie was made. There also needs to be a "Reception" section detailing both critical reactions, from notable critics, as well as box office success, home video sales, and any awards or nominations. The "Quotes" section and the "Trivia" section need to go. The "Plot" section needs significant clean up. Needs proper paragraph structure and should not be overly detailed. There should also be a detailed cast section. It appears there is already a massive todo list on the talk page simply to get up to "start class". Good Article status and even B-class are way better than this. Jay32183 23:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Good luck, everyone. Looks like you've got your work cut out for you.  Good luck finding any production information.   Its reception was thoroughly summed up in the intro.  The movie was negatively reviewed as lacking plot, so perhaps the extant plot section should simply be deleted.  There are plenty of movie entries which do not satisfy the boilerplate massive todo list  --Lexein 05:27, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, now. If I take out the Quotes and Trivia sections, can I put in a lot of WEASEL WORDS, an ORIGINAL RESEARCH just like in the recent Featured Article Gremlins 2 - The New Batch?  That would be keen. --Lexein 19:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)