Wikipedia:Peer review/Scotch College, Perth/archive2

Scotch College, Perth

 * Scotch College, Perth recently was a FA candidate and failed. I would like to see this article be FAed, so I have come here to fix the final problems. This article has been Peer reviewed before ((earlier review)). I have addressed these issues. Here is the FA page - FA candidate.
 * Any Suggestions on anything would be most helpful. Thanks -- HamedogTalk 08:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I would recommend the following:
 * Throughout the "history" section, you mention loads of statistics (mostly money), these all need sourcing. done -- HamedogTalk 04:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * "The project consists of researching the topic, producing the article and doing a maximum 5000 word write up on the project. The project is marked from 1 - 7 with 2 being a pass mark." - is this really necessary? -- HamedogTalk 08:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I think it is, as there is very little information on it here -- HamedogTalk 04:28, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It seems not really of interest to the readers of the page. I would strongly recommend it's removal. --Cel es tianpower háblame 11:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Removed -- HamedogTalk 12:03, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The "middle school structure" section could do with many more wikilinks.
 * I have put some more in, is that enough?-- HamedogTalk 04:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes. --Cel es tianpower háblame 11:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * One paragraph sections are bad: merge or expand them ("Novell computer system" and "Moray") DONE
 * Just list the sports like: "The students can play basketball, football, rugby..." rather than in a formatted list. DONE
 * Ditto the music section. DONE-- HamedogTalk 06:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Having said this, overall, it's a pretty good article. --Cel es tianpower háblame 14:21, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Any other suggestions? -- HamedogTalk 06:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I would also say that the subheading "ties" is unnecessary. My general rule is that if there is only one subsection in a section, it should be merged . --Cel es tianpower háblame 11:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Any other suggestions? -- HamedogTalk 11:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Done


 * Any other suggestions at all, any one?-- HamedogTalk 13:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)