Wikipedia:Peer review/Sigma Tau Gamma/archive1

Sigma Tau Gamma
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review to hopefully get it upgraded to feature article soon. Also, there are only a small number of people editing it and I want to make sure that no one person (including myself) impacts the style to greatly. Also I have written a lot of the content as staff member for the organization, so this will help to ensure a fair POV and neutrality.

Thanks, addisonschopp 21:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Brianboulton preliminary comments:-
 * The article has a major cleanup banner, placed by addisonschopp on 3 June. Articles for peer review must be clear of such banners; is this one still in effect?
 * There are several disambiguation links to fix. The toolbox in the right hand corner identifies them.
 * A number of section headings breach the MOS requirements on capitalisation, e.g. "Collegiate Menber Awards", "Important Dates" and others
 * The two books entered under "Further reading" are both used as sources in the article. "Further reading" is intended for books on the topic that are not cited. I suggest you change the heading to Bibliography.
 * The online citations are presented as bare urls, and need to be formatted properly. See WP:CITE for information on doing this

Brianboulton (talk) 20:47, 10 June 2010 (UTC)