Wikipedia:Peer review/Sikorsky S-10/archive1

Sikorsky S-10
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I look for ways in which to improve the article. Any comments are welcome.

Thanks,  Lourie Pieterse  16:40, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Ruhrfisch comments: This is an interesting article, but it needs a lot of work to meet Wikipedia's standards. Here are some suggestions for improvement. Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 02:22, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The lead should be an accessible and inviting overview of the whole article. Nothing important should be in the lead only - since it is a summary, it should all be repeated in the body of the article itself but the aircraft carrier seems to only be in the lead.
 * My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way but the Record section is not in there. Please see WP:LEAD
 * The article needs an image or two - www.aviastar.org/air/russia/sik_s-10.php has some and since the plane was only in use to 1916 I would think there are old wnough to be free to use now.
 * Measurements need to be given in both metric and English units in all cases - the convert template is useful here
 * Internet refs need URL, title, author if known, publisher and date accessed. cite web and other cite templates may be helpful. See WP:CITE and WP:V
 * A model article is useful for ideas and examples to follow - F-4 Phantom II is a FA and may be a useful model
 * Not much more to add now as this is so short