Wikipedia:Peer review/Situational judgement test/archive1

Situational judgement test
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because my class at Ball State University has been working hard to improve it but we feel that we need more advice from other Wikipedia editors.

Thanks, (Amgardner13 (talk) 13:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC))

Comments not an expert on the subject matter but some technical guidance. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think you should capitalise "Situational Judgement Test" in the opening sentence of the lead, it's not a proper noun. Same for "Inventories".
 * "Test tend to test " repetitive use of "test", not great prose.
 * "organization. [4]" avoid spaces between references and punctuation.
 * "to personality. [5]" see above.
 * "The situational judgement test have " grammar.
 * "came about by Bruce and Learner" what does that mean? They wrote it?  They discovered it?  Clarify this.
 * See WP:HEAD about section headings and avoid capitalising nouns that don't need to be capitalised.
 * "A Thesis Submitted to " -> "A thesis submitted..."
 * The examples are too much. You should just summarise what an example would be rather than copy/paste the whole question/answer for two of them.
 * The Sample tests section, you should try to format links to external sites consistently and preferably using one of the many citation templates.
 * Also, this list should be bullet-pointed.
 * References, please re-use them where appropriate using  (like ref 1).  You currently have the same ref being used in 3, 4, 5 and 14, also in 6 & 7, also in 8 through 13.
 * Format ref 8 etc correctly so the accessdate is shown properly.
 * Use WP:DASH i.e. replace hyphens with en-dash in the page ranges in the references.
 * See also section should come before references.