Wikipedia:Peer review/Skipper Roberts/archive2

Skipper Roberts
The old peer review is archived here: Peer review/Skipper Roberts/archive1.

I'd like to know what this needs to reach good article status. Should it be rewritten, should information be added/removed, and are there any formatting errors? If so, what are they? Tikallover 02:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Is there any more information on what trends the different Skippers were created to take advantage of? A few more citations could be nice - as a rule of thumb, anything that's controversial, any quotes or dates need citing.  Any less direct assertions need citing too - "some collectors say this", for example.  The history of the doll's shape is quite complete, which is good, but it feels lacking in how the doll was recieved in the wider world. How popular was Skipper compared to Barbie? Some of the doll-collectors' terms such as Mint In Box could use a wiki link, or a Wiktionary link. -Malkinann 13:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks; I'll try to fix those problems. Tikallover 17:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * What kind of dollars are you using for prices? US$? CA$? FJ$?  AU$? NZ$? -Malkinann 00:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * It's US dollars, and I tried to fix it. Thanks for pointing that out. Tikallover 01:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)