Wikipedia:Peer review/Slug (song)/archive1

Slug (song)
This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because it has failed three FA nominations for being too short and not comprehensive enough, despite the fact that shorter featured articles exist. Myself and other editors have done extensive research on sources for this topic and we all feel that the subject has been extensively covered and would like to see it pass an FA nomination.

Thanks, – Dream out loud (talk) 02:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Comment: As you're concerned with the length, I've listed some sources which could be used on the talk page of this PR. Not rich pickings, but there may be something of use there. They're all good, reputable publications, at least! J Milburn (talk) 11:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the comment and the review. I looked at the four sources you posted - three of them are already cited in the article and the fourth one just mentions the song but doesn't really say anything about it that I could include in the article.  Just to clarify, I personally have no issues with the article's length and feel it is fully comprehensive.  However, in each of the three FA noms, editors have shot it down solely based on that reason.  A user at WP:MUSIC recommended that I request a PR to help it become FA. – Dream out loud  (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)